RNA–Protein Interactions: an Intro to CLIP-seq

Proteins control the life of every mRNA: when it is spliced, where it goes, how long it lives, and when it is translated. To study that control you need to know exactly where a protein grabs the RNA. CLIP-seq is the method that maps those binding sites across the whole transcriptome, at close to single-nucleotide resolution. This lesson explains how it works, the variants you will see in papers, and why the controls make or break the result.

🔴 Advanced ⏱️ ~2 hr 💻 Command line 📚 RNA biology

Before you start

  • You've done RNA structure, and you're comfortable with the NGS workflow (alignment, peaks) from Track 2.
  • This is a methods-and-analysis lesson. Knowing how ChIP-seq works helps, since CLIP is its RNA cousin.
  • Any term new? The Glossary has it.

Learning objectives

By the end of this lesson you will be able to: explain what question CLIP-seq answers about RNA-protein binding, describe why UV crosslinking is the central trick, distinguish HITS-CLIP, PAR-CLIP, iCLIP, and eCLIP, and follow the path from reads to called binding sites.

The question CLIP answers

An RNA-binding protein (RBP) recognizes specific RNAs and acts on them. CLIP-seq, short for cross-linking and immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing, answers: for a given RBP, which RNA positions does it physically bind, across the entire transcriptome? The output is a map of binding sites (peaks), which you then turn into a binding motif and a list of regulated transcripts.

Why crosslinking is the whole trick

You could just pull the protein down with an antibody and sequence whatever RNA comes along, which is the older method called RIP. The problem is that RNAs re-associate and stick non-specifically after you break the cell open, so RIP is noisy. CLIP fixes this with a covalent crosslink made before lysis: a pulse of UV light forms a permanent covalent bond between the protein and the exact RNA nucleotides it is touching at that instant (a "zero-distance" crosslink). Because the bond is covalent, the RNA stays attached through harsh, stringent washes that strip away everything not directly bound. That is what gives CLIP its specificity.

The core workflow

  1. UV crosslink living cells, freezing each RBP onto the RNA it is bound to.
  2. Lyse and lightly digest with RNase to trim the RNA down to a footprint around the protein.
  3. Immunoprecipitate the RBP with a specific antibody, capturing the protein plus its crosslinked RNA.
  4. Stringent wash to remove non-crosslinked, background RNA.
  5. Recover the RNA, build a sequencing library (with adapters and unique molecular identifiers), and sequence.
  6. Map and call peaks: enriched pile-ups mark binding sites.

Decode the jargonCrosslink

A covalent bond formed (here by UV light) between a protein and the RNA nucleotide it is directly contacting. It survives stringent washing, which is how CLIP distinguishes a genuine, direct interaction from RNA that merely co-purifies.

The CLIP family: HITS-CLIP, PAR-CLIP, iCLIP, eCLIP

You will meet four names. They differ mainly in how they pin down the exact crosslink position and how they control for background.

MethodKey ideaHow it pinpoints the site
HITS-CLIPThe original transcriptome-wide CLIP (also just "CLIP-seq").Peak of reads over background.
PAR-CLIPCells are fed 4-thiouridine (4SU), which incorporates into RNA and crosslinks efficiently under 365 nm UV.Reverse transcription reads the crosslinked 4SU as a characteristic T→C transition, a single-nucleotide signature of the contact point.
iCLIPExploits that reverse transcriptase usually truncates at the crosslinked nucleotide (the leftover peptide blocks it).The read's truncation site marks the crosslink at single-nucleotide resolution.
eCLIPENCODE's robust, efficient version with a size-matched input control.Truncation site, with enrichment measured against the paired input.

The trend across these is toward single-nucleotide resolution and proper controls. PAR-CLIP's T→C transitions and iCLIP/eCLIP's truncation sites both locate the contact far more precisely than a broad read pile-up.

⚠️ Controls and pitfalls decide whether you can trust a peak

CLIP is powerful but prone to artefacts. Watch for: antibody specificity (a bad antibody pulls down the wrong protein), contamination by hyper-abundant RNAs (rRNA, snRNAs), a uridine crosslinking bias that makes U-rich regions over-represented, and PCR duplicates (which is why libraries use UMIs to deduplicate). The single most important safeguard is a control: eCLIP's size-matched input lets you ask "is this peak really enriched over background?" Always demand reproducibility across replicates too.

From reads to binding sites: the analysis

A typical eCLIP-style pipeline looks like this. You do not need to memorize the tools, but you should recognize the shape:

# 1. Trim adapters and remove PCR duplicates using the UMIs
# 2. Align the footprint reads to the genome (e.g. STAR)
# 3. Collapse duplicates by UMI so each original molecule counts once
# 4. Call peaks and test enrichment AGAINST the size-matched input
$ clipper --species hg38 --bam IP.bam --outfile peaks.bed
# 5. Keep peaks reproducible across replicates, then find the motif

The end products are a BED file of high-confidence binding sites, an enriched sequence motif (the protein's preferred sequence or structure), and the set of transcripts it regulates, which you can then cross with expression data.

🔶 Level up: real data and tools

The ENCODE project released eCLIP data for hundreds of human RBPs, all public. Common peak callers include CLIPper (eCLIP), PureCLIP, PARpipe/PARalyzer (PAR-CLIP), and Piranha. A great exercise once you finish this track: download one RBP's eCLIP data and reproduce its known binding motif.

Check your understanding

In a PAR-CLIP experiment you observe a strong enrichment of T→C transitions clustered at specific positions. What is the correct interpretation?
Correct. In PAR-CLIP, 4SU incorporated into RNA crosslinks to the protein; during reverse transcription the crosslinked 4SU is read as cytidine, producing the diagnostic T→C transition exactly at the contacted nucleotide. The clustered transitions are signal, not error.
A reviewer rejects a CLIP study that pulled down an RBP and sequenced co-purifying RNA but used no crosslinking and no input control. What is the strongest scientific objection?
Exactly. That design is essentially RIP. The covalent UV crosslink is what lets stringent washes remove non-specific RNA and report direct contacts; and a control (e.g. size-matched input, as in eCLIP) is required to call a region genuinely enriched. Both are missing.
Your CLIP peaks are dominated by ribosomal RNA and a handful of very highly expressed transcripts, and U-rich regions look over-represented. Which combination best explains this?
Right. Hyper-abundant RNAs leak into any pulldown, and UV crosslinking favors uridines, so U-rich and abundant regions inflate without normalization. Correcting against an input control, deduplicating with UMIs, and requiring cross-replicate reproducibility separate real binding from these well-known artefacts.
What is the fundamental purpose of the UV crosslinking step shared by CLIP-seq methods?
Correct. UV light forms a covalent bond between an RBP and the RNA in direct contact. That crosslink lets you wash stringently and pull down only genuinely bound RNA, giving near-nucleotide resolution rather than loose co-purification.
In eCLIP, why is a size-matched input (SMInput) control sequenced alongside the IP sample?
Exactly. Abundant and structured RNAs show up even without specific binding. The size-matched input captures that background, and peaks are called as enrichment of the IP over the input rather than from raw IP coverage alone.

Sources & further reading

  1. Licatalosi DD, et al. HITS-CLIP yields genome-wide insights into brain alternative RNA processing. Nature, 2008.
  2. Hafner M, et al. Transcriptome-wide identification of RNA-binding protein and microRNA target sites by PAR-CLIP. Cell, 2010.
  3. König J, et al. iCLIP reveals the function of hnRNP particles in splicing at individual nucleotide resolution. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2010.
  4. Van Nostrand EL, et al. Robust transcriptome-wide discovery of RBP binding sites with enhanced CLIP (eCLIP). Nat Methods, 2016. ENCODE eCLIP data

Last reviewed: June 2026.

Next in Track 4

Epitranscriptomics 101: m6A and RNA modifications →